| A 30-day late on an account that is open and now current | Yes, this is the case it was made for | The original creditor still furnishes the item and has discretion over how it reports | Nothing else; this is the right process |
| A 60 or 90-day late on an open, current account | Yes, but less often answered | Same furnisher and same discretion, applied to a more serious item | The dispute process only if any detail is actually wrong |
| A late payment on an account you have since closed | Sometimes | The creditor may still furnish the closed account, but has less relationship reason to act | Time; a closed account's items age off on their own schedule |
| A charge-off still held by the original creditor | Rarely | Discretion exists but the item reflects a loss the creditor took | A settlement or payment arrangement discussed directly with the creditor |
| An account sold to a debt buyer | No | The original creditor no longer furnishes it, and the debt buyer reports its own separate item | Debt validation with the current holder under the Fair Debt Collection Practices Act |
| A collection account | No, not by goodwill | A collection agency's reporting obligations run to accuracy, not courtesy | Debt validation, then the dispute process if anything reported is wrong |
| A medical bill in collection | No, not by goodwill | Same reasoning; the agency furnishes what it holds | Validation, an insurance re-review of the underlying claim, and the dispute process if the balance is wrong |
| A bankruptcy, judgment, or tax lien | No | These come from public court records rather than from a furnisher | Nothing a letter can address; these follow their own reporting timeframes |
| An item that is genuinely inaccurate | Do not use goodwill here | A goodwill request concedes the item is accurate, which gives up the stronger position | The Fair Credit Reporting Act dispute process, with the bureau and the furnisher |